1982 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2011 Mazda 2
To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 2 weights approximately 386 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Mazda 2 has automatic transmission and 1982 Autobianchi A 112 has manual transmission. 1982 Autobianchi A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Mazda 2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Autobianchi A 112 | 2011 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Autobianchi | Mazda |
Model | A 112 | 2 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1046 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 43 L |