1982 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 991 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 2013 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Autobianchi A 112 | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
| Model | A 112 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 965 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 438 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1651 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4778 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2035 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1412 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 61 L |
