1982 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood
To start off, 1982 Bentley Mulsanne is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood would be higher. At 7,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood weights approximately 350 kg more than 1982 Bentley Mulsanne.
Because 1982 Bentley Mulsanne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bentley Mulsanne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Bentley Mulsanne | 1968 Cadillac Fleetwood | |
| Make | Bentley | Cadillac |
| Model | Mulsanne | Fleetwood |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 7733 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 228 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 2600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 6240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3810 mm |
