1982 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 2010 BMW X5
To start off, 2010 BMW X5 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bentley Mulsanne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bentley Mulsanne would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW X5 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1982 Bentley Mulsanne.
Because 2010 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bentley Mulsanne. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Bentley Mulsanne | 2010 BMW X5 | |
| Make | Bentley | BMW |
| Model | Mulsanne | X5 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 260 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 2260 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4854 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1933 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1765 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2934 mm |
