1982 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bentley Mulsanne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bentley Mulsanne would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 86 kg more than 1982 Bentley Mulsanne.
Because 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bentley Mulsanne. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Bentley Mulsanne | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Bentley | Jeep |
| Model | Mulsanne | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 6400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 470 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 2336 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1755 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2916 mm |
