1982 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 2013 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2013 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bentley Mulsanne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bentley Mulsanne would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 464 kg more than 1982 Bentley Mulsanne.
Because 2013 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bentley Mulsanne. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Bentley Mulsanne | 2013 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Bentley | Toyota |
| Model | Mulsanne | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 376 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 2714 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1955 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3100 mm |
