1982 Bentley Mulsanne vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bentley Mulsanne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bentley Mulsanne would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bentley Mulsanne weights approximately 790 kg more than 2013 Volvo C30.
Because 1982 Bentley Mulsanne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bentley Mulsanne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Bentley Mulsanne has automatic transmission and 2013 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2013 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Bentley Mulsanne will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bentley Mulsanne | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Bentley | Volvo |
Model | Mulsanne | C30 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4266 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2039 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1447 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2640 mm |