1982 Bitter SC vs. 1974 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1982 Bitter SC is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Brougham (193 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1982 Bitter SC. (177 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1982 Bitter SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 730 kg more than 1982 Bitter SC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bitter SC | 1974 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Bitter | Cadillac |
Model | SC | Brougham |
Year Released | 1982 | 1974 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 7732 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 193 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 2330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3390 mm |