1982 Bitter SC vs. 2000 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2000 Mazda AZ is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,969 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bitter SC weights approximately 600 kg more than 2000 Mazda AZ.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bitter SC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Bitter SC | 2000 Mazda AZ | |
| Make | Bitter | Mazda |
| Model | SC | AZ |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2969 cc | 656 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2370 mm |
