1982 Bitter SC vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,969 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Bitter SC (178 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Bitter SC should accelerate faster than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bitter SC weights approximately 906 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Bitter SC | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Bitter | Westfield |
| Model | SC | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 2969 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 444 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2320 mm |
