1982 Bitter SC vs. 2005 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2005 Nissan Murano is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bitter SC would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Murano (245 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1982 Bitter SC. (177 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1982 Bitter SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Murano weights approximately 144 kg more than 1982 Bitter SC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Murano, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Murano (334 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Bitter SC. (248 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Bitter SC.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bitter SC | 2005 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Bitter | Nissan |
Model | SC | Murano |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 248 Nm | 334 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.8 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2960 mm |