1982 Bitter SC vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,969 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1982 Bitter SC. (178 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1982 Bitter SC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bitter SC weights approximately 37 kg more than 2006 Acura CSX.
Because 1982 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bitter SC | 2006 Acura CSX | |
Make | Bitter | Acura |
Model | SC | CSX |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2969 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2700 mm |