1982 Bitter SC vs. 2006 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac DTS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bitter SC would be higher. At 4,565 cc, 2006 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bitter SC | 2006 Cadillac DTS | |
Make | Bitter | Cadillac |
Model | SC | DTS |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 4565 cc |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1910 mm |