1982 Bitter SC vs. 2006 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2006 Subaru Forester is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Bitter SC (177 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2006 Subaru Forester. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Bitter SC should accelerate faster than 2006 Subaru Forester. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Subaru Forester weights approximately 33 kg more than 1982 Bitter SC.
Because 2006 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bitter SC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Bitter SC (248 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Subaru Forester. (225 Nm). This means 1982 Bitter SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Subaru Forester.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bitter SC | 2006 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Bitter | Subaru |
Model | SC | Forester |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 163 HP |
Torque | 248 Nm | 225 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 99.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.8 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1633 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2530 mm |