1982 Bitter SC vs. 2009 Chrysler Aspen
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bitter SC would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (299 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1982 Bitter SC. (177 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1982 Bitter SC.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (330 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Bitter SC. (248 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Bitter SC.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bitter SC | 2009 Chrysler Aspen | |
Make | Bitter | Chrysler |
Model | SC | Aspen |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 299 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 248 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3030 mm |