1982 Bitter SC vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,969 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Bitter SC (178 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (151 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Bitter SC should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 5 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1982 Bitter SC.
Because 1982 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Bitter SC (248 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Bitter SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bitter SC | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Bitter | Mazda |
Model | SC | 5 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2969 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 248 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1760 mm |