1982 Bitter SC vs. 2009 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2009 Saturn Outlook is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bitter SC would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Outlook (277 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1982 Bitter SC. (178 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1982 Bitter SC.
Because 1982 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Outlook, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saturn Outlook (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Bitter SC. (248 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2009 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Bitter SC. 2009 Saturn Outlook has automatic transmission and 1982 Bitter SC has manual transmission. 1982 Bitter SC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Saturn Outlook will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Bitter SC | 2009 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Bitter | Saturn |
Model | SC | Outlook |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2969 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 277 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 248 Nm | 253 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 11.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1990 mm |