1982 BMW 316 vs. 1984 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1984 Ford Ranger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 316 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford Ranger (109 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1982 BMW 316. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 316.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 316. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 316 | 1984 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 316 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1984 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1573 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4690 mm |
