1982 BMW 316 vs. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 316 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker (96 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1982 BMW 316. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 316.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 316. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 316 | 1996 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 316 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1573 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 96 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2210 mm |