1982 BMW 316 vs. 2000 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 316 would be higher. At 2,458 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Dakota (118 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1982 BMW 316. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 316.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 316. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 316 | 2000 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 316 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1573 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2850 mm |