1982 BMW 316 vs. 2001 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2001 Lancia Zeta is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 316 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Zeta (134 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1982 BMW 316. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 316.
Because 1982 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 316 | 2001 Lancia Zeta | |
| Make | BMW | Lancia |
| Model | 316 | Zeta |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1573 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 134 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |
