1982 BMW 316 vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 316 would be higher. At 1,573 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 BMW 316 (89 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (83 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1982 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 316 | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | BMW | Volkswagen |
Model | 316 | Polo |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1573 cc | 1423 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |