1982 BMW 316 vs. 2006 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2006 Cadillac SRX is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 316 would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac SRX (255 HP) has 166 more horse power than 1982 BMW 316. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 316.
Because 2006 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 316. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 316 | 2006 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 316 | SRX |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1573 cc | 3556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 255 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 76 L |
