1982 BMW 316 vs. 2006 Ford E-250
To start off, 2006 Ford E-250 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 316 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-250 (225 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1982 BMW 316. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 316.
Because 1982 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-250, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 316 | 2006 Ford E-250 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 316 | E-250 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1573 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 225 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 132 L |