1982 BMW 316 vs. 2006 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 316 would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Rexton (163 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1982 BMW 316. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 316.
Because 2006 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 316. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 316 | 2006 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | BMW | SsangYong |
| Model | 316 | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1573 cc | 2696 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 163 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |
