1982 BMW 316 vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 316 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP) has 181 more horse power than 1982 BMW 316. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 316.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 316. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 316 | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 316 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1573 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 270 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 76 L |