1982 BMW 316 vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 316 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP) has 184 more horse power than 1982 BMW 316. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 316.
Because 1982 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 316 | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 316 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1573 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 273 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 76 L |