1982 BMW 316 vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 316 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1982 BMW 316. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 316.
Because 1982 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 316 | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 316 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1573 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |