1982 BMW 318 vs. 2004 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2004 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 318. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 318 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac DeVille (275 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1982 BMW 318. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 318. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 768 kg more than 1982 BMW 318. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 BMW 318 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 318. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac DeVille (420 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 318. (140 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 318.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 318 | 2004 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 318 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1765 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 420 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1788 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |