1982 BMW 320 vs. 1999 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 1999 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,463 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 320 | 1999 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 320 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2463 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 57 L |