1982 BMW 320 vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 320 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 320 | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 320 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 74 L |