1982 BMW 320 vs. 2009 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 320 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1982 BMW 320 has manual transmission. 1982 BMW 320 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 320 | 2009 Honda CR-V | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | 320 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 58 L |