1982 BMW 320 vs. 2009 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1982 BMW 320 has manual transmission. 1982 BMW 320 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 320 | 2009 Jaguar XF | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 320 | XF |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 204 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 69 L |