1982 BMW 323 vs. 1964 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1982 BMW 323 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1982 BMW 323. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 900 kg more than 1982 BMW 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 323 | 1964 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 323 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2315 cc | 7027 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 2120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 79 L |
