1982 BMW 323 vs. 2008 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 323 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 60 kg more than 1982 BMW 323.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 323 | 2008 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 323 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2493 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1560 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2890 mm |
