1982 BMW 323 vs. 2009 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 323 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP) has 107 more horse power than 1982 BMW 323. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 BMW 323 weights approximately 250 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 323. (205 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 323 | 2009 Ford E-350 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 323 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2315 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 255 HP |
Torque | 205 Nm | 475 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 132 L |