1982 BMW 323 vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 323 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 BMW 323 weights approximately 43 kg more than 2013 Volvo C30.
Because 1982 BMW 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 323 | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | 323 | C30 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2493 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1457 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2640 mm |