1982 BMW 325 vs. 1959 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1982 BMW 325 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,153 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 BMW 325 (120 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1959 Jeep CJ5. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 1959 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1982 BMW 325.
Because 1959 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 325. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 BMW 325 (230 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Jeep CJ5. (180 Nm @ 1350 RPM). This means 1982 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 325 | 1959 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | 325 | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1959 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2693 cc | 3153 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 1350 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2060 mm |
