1982 BMW 325 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 325 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1982 BMW 325. (120 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 780 kg more than 1982 BMW 325. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 325. (230 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 325 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 325 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2693 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 87 L |