1982 BMW 325 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 325 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (426 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 306 more horse power than 1982 BMW 325. (120 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 325. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 611 kg more than 1982 BMW 325. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (569 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 325. (230 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 325 | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 325 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2693 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 426 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1751 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 72 L |