1982 BMW 325 vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 325 would be higher. At 2,693 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1982 BMW 325. (120 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 325.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 325. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 325. (230 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 325 | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | BMW | Citroen |
| Model | 325 | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2693 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
