1982 BMW 328 vs. 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk
To start off, 1982 BMW 328 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk would be higher. At 3,041 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 BMW 328 weights approximately 156 kg more than 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 BMW 328 (210 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk. (206 Nm). This means 1982 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 328 | 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk | |
| Make | BMW | Studebaker |
| Model | 328 | Silver Hawk |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 3041 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1350 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3070 mm |
