1982 BMW 328 vs. 1969 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1982 BMW 328 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 569 kg more than 1982 BMW 328.
Because 1982 BMW 328 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 328. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Cadillac Calais (710 Nm) has 500 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 1969 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 328 | 1969 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 328 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 228 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 710 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 2075 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3300 mm |
