1982 BMW 328 vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger

To start off, 1982 BMW 328 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 19 kg more than 1982 BMW 328.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (421 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328.

Compare all specifications:

1982 BMW 328 1969 Dodge Challenger
Make BMW Dodge
Model 328 Challenger
Year Released 1982 1969
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2793 cc 5562 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 235 HP
Torque 210 Nm 421 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1506 kg 1525 kg
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2800 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]