1982 BMW 328 vs. 1999 Mazda Activehicle
To start off, 1999 Mazda Activehicle is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mazda Activehicle is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda Activehicle weights approximately 64 kg more than 1982 BMW 328.
Because 1999 Mazda Activehicle is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 328. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Activehicle will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda Activehicle (278 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 1999 Mazda Activehicle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 328 | 1999 Mazda Activehicle | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | 328 | Activehicle |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 2967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 278 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1570 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2480 mm |
