1982 BMW 328 vs. 2000 Buick Park Avenue
To start off, 2000 Buick Park Avenue is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 3,798 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Buick Park Avenue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Buick Park Avenue weights approximately 234 kg more than 1982 BMW 328.
Because 1982 BMW 328 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 328. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Buick Park Avenue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Buick Park Avenue (387 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 2000 Buick Park Avenue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 328 | 2000 Buick Park Avenue | |
| Make | BMW | Buick |
| Model | 328 | Park Avenue |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 3798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 387 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1740 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2780 mm |
