1982 BMW 328 vs. 2003 Cadillac Catera
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Catera is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac Catera (201 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1982 BMW 328. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 328. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 235 kg more than 1982 BMW 328. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac Catera (260 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 2003 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328. 2003 Cadillac Catera has automatic transmission and 1982 BMW 328 has manual transmission. 1982 BMW 328 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Cadillac Catera will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 328 | 2003 Cadillac Catera | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 328 | Catera |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2962 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 201 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1705 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2940 mm |
