1982 BMW 328 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1982 BMW 328. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 328. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 246 kg more than 1982 BMW 328. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1982 BMW 328 has manual transmission. 1982 BMW 328 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 328 | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | 328 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1716 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2700 mm |
