1982 BMW 328 vs. 2004 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2004 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 330 kg more than 1982 BMW 328.
Because 1982 BMW 328 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 BMW 328. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac DeVille (407 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 328 | 2004 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 328 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 4565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1836 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2940 mm |
