1982 BMW 328 vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 936 kg more than 1982 BMW 328.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 328. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 BMW 328. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 BMW 328 | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | BMW | Land Rover |
| Model | 328 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 2442 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2890 mm |
